Episode 48 of the Public Key podcast is here! In this episode, we talk with Michael Selig (Counsel, Asset Management at Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP), who details the ongoing challenges with cryptocurrency and regulatory oversight in the USA.
You can listen or subscribe now on Spotify, Apple, or Audible. Keep reading for a full preview of episode 48.
Public Key Episode 48 preview: The impact of cryptocurrencies being deemed as securities
Crypto is taking congress by storm, and every authority from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), New York Attorney General (NYAG), and U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) is weighing in on their regulatory oversight over Bitcoin, Ethereum, and everything in between.
In this episode, Ian Andrews (Chief Marketing Officer, Chainalysis) sat down with Michael Selig (Counsel, Asset Management at Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP) to help demystify the ever-changing landscape of USA regulations and cryptocurrency.
Mike and Ian delve into the latest developments, enforcement actions, and challenges facing the crypto industry and anticipate the impact of proposed custody rules and securities implications could have on the crypto ecosystem. They even try to hypothesize what regulations on decentralized protocols could look like.
Quote of the episode
“Satoshi Nakamoto may have never envisioned that ordinal NFTs would be on top of Bitcoin and so to rely upon Satoshi Nakamoto to make disclosures under a Form S-1 about ordinals and all the crazy things that have been done on Bitcoin, that would just be absurd” – Michael Selig (Counsel, Asset Management at Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP)
Minute-by-minute episode breakdown
- (2:35) – Mike’s origin story and first interaction with Bitcoin before going to law school
- (5:35) – Why is the question of whether cryptocurrency is a security or not still unanswered?
- (12:25) – Does the NYAG have a strong case saying that Ether is a security?
- (20:00) – Nothing starts decentralized, and what does that mean for regulatory enforcement
- (26:30) – What would happen if most cryptocurrencies were deemed commodities?
- (30:55) – How recent enforcement actions might shape the way crypto staking is offered in the USA
- (36:25) – How the proposed SEC revisions to the Custody Rule could impact crypto
- (40:05) – Where does DeFi fit into regulatory oversight in the USA
Related resources
Check out more resources provided by Chainalysis that perfectly complement this episode of the Public Key.
- Report: The Chainalysis 2023 Crypto Crime Report
- Conference: Chainalysis Links Conference 2023 in New York City
- Website: Willkie: Providing leading edge legal solutions
- Article: CoinDesk: What If Regulators Wrote Rules for Crypto?
- Article: CoinDesk: 2023: The Year of Regulation vs. Decentralization
- Chainalysis Blog: Here’s What On-Chain Data Tells Us About Crypto’s Reaction to the Demise of Silicon Valley Bank And USDC’s Depegging
- Twitter: Chainalysis Twitter: Building trust in blockchains
- TikTok: Newly launched Chainalysis TikTok page
- YouTube: Chainalysis YouTube page is completely revamped
- Website: Chainalysis: We are paving the way for a global economy built on blockchains.
Speakers on today’s episode
- Ian Andrews * Host * (Chief Marketing Officer, Chainalysis)
- Michael Selig (Counsel, Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP)
This website may contain links to third-party sites that are not under the control of Chainalysis, Inc. or its affiliates (collectively “Chainalysis”). Access to such information does not imply association with, endorsement of, approval of, or recommendation by Chainalysis of the site or its operators, and Chainalysis is not responsible for the products, services, or other content hosted therein.
Our podcasts are for informational purposes only, and are not intended to provide legal, tax, financial, or investment advice. Listeners should consult their own advisors before making these types of decisions. Chainalysis has no responsibility or liability for any decision made or any other acts or omissions in connection with your use of this material.
Chainalysis does not guarantee or warrant the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, suitability or validity of the information in any particular podcast and will not be responsible for any claim attributable to errors, omissions, or other inaccuracies of any part of such material.
Unless stated otherwise, reference to any specific product or entity does not constitute an endorsement or recommendation by Chainalysis. The views expressed by guests are their own and their appearance on the program does not imply an endorsement of them or any entity they represent. Views and opinions expressed by Chainalysis employees are those of the employees and do not necessarily reflect the views of the company.